Showing posts with label Police. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Police. Show all posts

Friday, April 10, 2015

RICO Act Racketeering Against Larry and Mary Neal


Neither Tennessee nor Georgia or the United States of America had/have the legal authority to deny Larry Neal or Mary Neal, being free people (13th Amendment), of the right to life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness (which pursuit is curtailed while denied the right to privacy and freedom of expression), and the rights to full citizenship (14th Amendment), and the rights to equal protection of the laws (14th Amendment and Civil Rights Act of 1866), or to deprive Mary Neal of the right to vote in the 2008 election by following her everywhere, with police services denied, as intimidation and persecution for asserting the aforementioned rights (15th Amendment).

However, I assert that officials in State and Federal Government did and do collude to violate Larry Neal's and Mary Neal's rights that are protected under the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and the Civil Rights Act of 1866, making co-conspirators, including officers of the court and officers of various Internet companies as well as police officials and other elected and appointed government officials, guilty of RICO Act racketeering and collusion against Larry Neal's and Mary Neal's rights not only under the U.S. Constitution but also under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA), the Civil Rights Act, the Convention Against Torture, and Executive Order 13107, implementing human rights treaties.

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), was a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, could not be American citizens and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court, and that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the federal territories acquired after the creation of the United States. The Dred Scott decision of 1857 was functionally superseded by the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which gave African Americans full citizenship.

The Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. On December 18, 1865, Secretary of State William H. Seward proclaimed its adoption. It was the first of the three Reconstruction Amendments adopted following the American Civil War.

The Civil Rights Act of 1866, 14 Stat. 27-30, enacted April 9, 1866, was the first United States federal law to define US citizenship and affirmed that all citizens were equally protected by the law. It was mainly intended to protect the civil rights of African-Americans, in the wake of the American Civil War.

The Fourteenth Amendment (July 9, 1868), Section 1. Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. The Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment provides a broad definition of citizenship, overruling the Supreme Court's decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), which had held that Americans descended from African slaves could not be citizens of the United States.

The Fifteenth Amendment (Amendment XV) to the United States Constitution prohibits the federal and state governments from denying a citizen the right to vote based on that citizen's "race, color, or previous condition of servitude." It was ratified on February 3, 1870, as the third and last of the Reconstruction Amendments. 


I AM NOT YOUR SLAVE, COINTELPRO. 


Mary Loves Justice Neal
marylovesjustice@gmail.com
Phone (678) 531.0262 or (571)335-1741
Wrongful Death of Larry Neal
http://WrongfulDeathofLarryNeal.com
"Human Rights Demand" Radio Station Manager
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/humanrightsdemand
Assistance to the Incarcerated Mentally Ill
http://AIMI-humanrights.blogspot.com
Dog Justice for Mentally Ill
http://DogJusticeforMentallyIll.blogspot.com
Margaret Sanger, a racist Nazi, is being considered for the $20 bill. Bravo!
http://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2015/04/margaret-sanger-on-us-money-bravo.html

Friday, August 9, 2013

Police Services and NSA re Elder's Sex Aubse

Hattie Neal in her bedroom's hospital bed where our stalkers' nurse impostor 
sexually assaulted the 90-yr-old mother of Larry Neal

I sent Det. K.W. Moore the information in the email copied below on July 4. I never heard back from him. I put in a call to him today when I searched for the email and the email did not respond to my search. I called police, and then the email suddenly reappeared in my email box. It regards the sex assault done on my 90-yr-old mother by a woman who came to my home posing as a nurse from my mother's home health company. First, DeKalb County Police Department refused to take the report on my mother's abuse, just as they refused at first to take a police report on our home burglary in August 2012. Then I wrote to Congressman Hank Johnson and to Senator Chambliss and asked why my home is refused police services. Then a police officer came to take our report, but he refused to take the IP addresses of the individuals who take over our computer and the tag number for an individual who admitted he stalks me for hire. As far as I know, monitoring our computers and telephones was the only way for the nurse impostor to know my mom used home health services. The service had just started.

Detective Moore came to my house on the one and only day that I was away from home out of 30 days, and I sent him this email so he would have the info to work with, but I received no response to date. I believe the nurse impersonator came with a poison suppository to kill my mother. I took a picture of a navy blue vehicle exactly like the one the fake nurse was in parked at a neighbor's home. It is a Toyota. (If you read my articles, you know about my "neighbors".)

I cannot make police respond to crimes done against my family. I cannot make the United States Department of Justice respond to our Freedom of Information Act requests with records and answers regarding the secret arrest and murder of Larry Neal. I cannot make NSA or whomever takes over our computers and telephones STOP doing it. I cannot stop malicious prosecution of relatives, burglaries on my home to remove Neals v. The Cochran Firm records, stalking, spraying big chemtrail "X"s over our house (see it in the next article in JusticeGagged), outlining our home with paint for harassment by plane, and many other crimes. But THEY WILL NOT DO IT SECRETLY. The worse the retribution gets, the LOUDER our complaints will become.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: MaryLovesJustice Neal <marylovesjustice@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:18 AM
Subject: Elder Abuse
To: KWMoore@dekalbcountyga.gov

Hello, Det. Moore. As I told you on the phone, individuals who I suspect sent the fake nurse knew about my mother using home health services because they monitor our phone calls and computer messages. If you check these IP addresses and this tag number, you may find people who sent the woman who falsely presented herself as being a nurse from my mother's home health company. The IP addresses and telephone number belong to individuals who hacked into our electronic communication. The car tag was on a car driven by a young black man who admitted he was "paid well" to stalk me. Other than family members, the surveillance team members are the only people who knew about Mama having home health care. She had only had the service for about a week.

June 2011: I made a police report about the young man who admitted to being one of my stalkers along with the car tag: GA BKP8027 (Case No. 11-070074).

July 2011: IE Sent Data to Remote Host 67.215.253.140; IE Sent Data to Remote Host 74.125.159.191; IE Sent Data to Remote Host 74.125.67.191; and Application "SYSTEM" sent data to Remote Host 67.125.253.140.

March 2013:
We detected a login into your account from an unrecognized device on Monday, March 25, 2013 at 12:34pm.
Operating System: Unknown
Browser: Unknown
Location: Dallas, TX, US (IP=174.141.208.114)

Friday, March 22, 2013 at 2:14am: We (Facebook) detected a login into your account from a new device named "Ex: my phone or my computer"
Operating System: Unknown
Browser: Unknown
Location: Dallas, TX, US (IP=174.141.208.119)

Most Recent Telephone Takeover: My daughter called her husband's number to ask that he return home from work early, and a stalker messaged her back and said, "OK, sweetie" from xxxxxx. She saved the messages to/from this individual on her phone, in case you wish to see them. A stalker also assigned himself co-administrator on her phone from DarkDude426@gmail.com

[We later discovered that "OK, sweetie" message was to a group mail and legitimate.]

We have other IP addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses of the stalkers, but these should be enough for you to investigate and hopefully find out who employed the "nurse." In my opinion, these crimes also relate to our home burglary in August 2012, when nothing was stolen but my court records and hardcopy evidence related to Neals v. The Cochran Firm, for which my mother was a plaintiff. The "nurse" visited my mother when that case was cited in litigation against The Cochran Firm in California: McMurray v. The Cochran Firm.

The woman who played the "nurse" was a black person, approx. 5'7" tall, with dark brown skin. She seemed to have a medium build, roughly 150 pounds. She looked like she was between 30 and 45 years of age. She seemingly wore her hair without artificial hair added, and it was pulled back. She drove a navy blue vehicle that she seemed uncomfortable driving, as though she was not the owner. She took a long time to park, because she did not handle the vehicle well. She spoke with a Caribbean or African accent, although it could have been contrived. She wore a scrub top and regular pants.

If you have any questions, please call me at 678.531.0262. If you get the voice mail instead of me, please know that the stalkers may erase your message. In fact, you have no assurance that it will be anyone in my house that you speak with if you get a live person on the phone. Stalkers sometimes redirect my phone to ring at their locales rather than our home. Please confirm receipt.*
________
*If Det. Moore confirmed receipt, I did not receive same to my email box.

We Are Government CRIME VICTIMS, and we assert the following rights provided under U.S. Code 18, Section 3771:

Crime victims' rights means the eight rights which are included in Section 3771 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code, Crimes and Criminal Procedure. These rights are:
  • The right to be reasonably protected from the accused;
  • The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding, or any parole proceeding, involving the crime or any release or escape of the accused;
  • The right not to be excluded from any such public court proceeding, unless the court, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim would be materially altered if the victim heard other testimony at the proceeding;
  • The right to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court involving release, plea, [or] sentencing, or any parole proceeding;
  • The reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the government in the case;
  • The right to full and timely restitution as provided in law;
  • The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay, and
  • The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy.
For purposes of these rights and services, victims are defined in specific ways in the law.
http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/victim_assistance/victim_rights
U.S. Code is also violated when citizens are retaliated against for engaging in any activity protected by the U.S. Constitution, such as using freedom of press ad free speech to seek justice after the secret arrest and murder of a loved one and exposing other such crimes. Unfortunately, when it comes to using laws to protect Americans' rights, especially for black people, America might as well be lawless.