EXPOSED blog "shielded" after reparations article

After I published "Twelve Years a Slave: A Case for Reparations" at my EXPOSED blog, I have had a strange new symbol on the top right margin for all the articles in that blog:   shows at http://FreeSpeakBlog.blogspot.com . Google explains the issue thusly:

"This page has insecure content."
Issue
Websites that ask for sensitive information, such as usernames and passwords, often use secure connections to transmit content to and from the computer you're using. If you're visiting a site via a secure connection, Google Chrome will verify that the content on the webpage has been transmitted safely. If it detects certain types of content on the page coming from insecure channels, it can automatically prevent the content from loading and you'll see a shield icon appearing in the address bar. By blocking the content and possible security gaps, Chrome protects your information on the page from falling into the wrong hands.

At one point while I was trying to find the answer to the symbol, a url saying something about cookies appeared: http://www.erikrush.com/ . Last night, I tried to listen to Dr. Darrow's interview with Erik Rush on the Erik Rush radio show, but I could not get it to play (taped Nov. 19). I tried to copy and paste the url to the interview into a draft at my Exposed blog, but could not do that either. I did not plan to publish the interview, but I wanted to hear it. I did not save the draft. None of my blogs should ask for usernames, passwords, etc. In fact, they should not even ask people who want to comment to unscramble a Captcha code, but I discovered that some of them do. Cyberstalkers want to make communicating with Mary Neal very difficult - actually, they would like to make it impossible. I closed out of Erik Rush's site when it asked me for a username and password. I was not that interested in what Dr. Darrow had to say. I figure if his allegations were true, surely something more would have been done to address the alleged treachery. But, maybe not. Google "Cochran Firm Fraud."

I found on my computer (Google Chromebook OS) the following message when I tried to hear the mp3s on Rush's site: The Following Cookies Were Set When You Viewed This Page:
www.erikrush.com
PHPSESSID

___utma
___utmb
___utmc
___utmz
nm_transient-id

I instructed the computer to block the cookies, then I cleared the cookies set on the computer. Still the shield appears at EXPOSED blog.

I don't know if the shield has anything to do with Erik Rush's site and the cookies it tried to set. At EXPOSED blog, I have a draft of an article awaiting publication that carries explosive information about San Jose State University. I wonder if the shield is to hide the fact that African American men are killed or seriously assaulted at that school every few years. The case that is getting national publicity today about the freshman who was tortured, called racially denigrating names, and chained by his fellow students is NOT the only or worst case. In fact, Gregory Johnson, Jr., was murdered there in 2008 in Sigma Chi Fraternity House during his junior year, according to his mother.

The official story goes that Gregory hanged himself in a basement with a very low ceiling. Greg was 6 feet, 2 inches tall, and we doubt whether he could commit suicide by hanging in a basement that was several inches shorter than he was. Gregory was a happy, well-adjusted young man living in an otherwise all-white frat house, who was killed on November 22 (like President Kennedy was), shortly after President Obama was elected. Gregory's dead body was supposedly cut down from the basement and taken to his room in the frat house by students. No explanation was offered for the six-inch gash on the back of Gregory's head where his brains were oozing out. I was surprised to learn that the latest incident of racism on San Jose State University is the fourth incident where black male students were killed or brutalized (as far as we know -- there could be more). Two of the three previous deaths and catastrophic injuries also happened in November. Could be a tradition. San Jose is near Silicon Valley. My cyberstalkers could be school alumni, for all I know.

I don't know what I must do to get rid of the shield icon at my EXPOSED blog, and I would appreciate advice on this. Perhaps I should remove the "Twelve Years a Slave: A Case for Reparations" article, since I do not remember the symbol being there before I published it. People are VERY touchy about slavery and Jim Crow reparations, although other ethnic groups that experienced captivity, enslavement, and systemic discrimination by the USA were paid reparations. Maybe high officials are not really regretful about slavery. After all, it brought this country such a long way, and Caucasians yet enjoy the fruits of slave labor. Or maybe this new "shield" at my blog is not about the reparations article at all. Perhaps I should publish the San Jose expose' in another blog or in independent online news media instead of EXPOSED. Like most of the articles in EXPOSED, the truth about San Jose University is front page information that is censored. Most of my articles are about cover-ups. If you can advise me on this, please let me know.

WELL, I DID IT. I removed the draft to my San Jose article, and I also removed a brand new article I had published in EXPOSED that carries links to recent interviews with Indigenous People, because I already have it published at the MaryLovesJustice blog http://MaryLovesJustice.blogspot.com . It so censored that I cannot get the article to respond to its name in search engines: "U.S. Occupation of Native Americans."
http://marylovesjustice.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-us-occupation-of-native-americans.html
The first interview with David Alvarez is so censored that it did not become an archived tape available at Blogtalkradio for at least 24 hours after the interview. I imagine tonight's interview with James Cosner, a Native American author, is controversial, also. Is there anyone in the whole wide world who does not already know about the Native Americans' genocide? I cannot understand so much censorship surrounding well known subject matter. It is ridiculous. In any case, with those two articles gone (the draft about San Jose and the published article carrying interviews with Native Americans) the shield is still there. Therefore, it has to be the reparations article that creates problems for my censorship team. The only other recent article is

Special MaryLovesJustice Broadcast Nov. 10, 2013
http://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2013/11/special-marylovesjustice-broadcast-nov.html

I don't think NSA should carry on a cyberwar against freedom of press, if my censorship is some government operation. The USDOJ should NOT help jails to hide disabled citizens' secret arrests and murders; then there would be nothing to hide. And taxpayers' money should not be used to suppress due process of law. I am sure that is illegal.

(five url's in this article)

Justice Gagged re HubPages

(nine paragraphs, nine links, and signature block)   Question:  Is the First Amendment still viable, or has it been reduced to an arbitrary privilege that elitists grant or withhold, depending on whether citizens say "yessa, boss" in deferential tones as suits the "slave class" in America?  I tried to post that question at my Google Blogger Help forum, but it was rejected, hopefully by Cyberdogs and not Google itself.  We will all be deep in the End Game if the giant Google ever aligns itself against free speech considering its vast capabilities outlined by its former CEO.  Google is like Santa Claus:  "It knows when you are sleeping; it knows when you're awake; it knows if you've been bad or good, so be good for goodness sake!"  My latest Blogger Help Forum request is at this link:  http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/blogger/thread?tid=09e3c151a265748c&hl=en

I enjoy writing at HubPages and have published numerous articles there (link to Mary Neal's HubPages articles is in my signature block below).  The only reason I do not publish there more often is the restriction against listing URLs in ones' Hubs, although I understand the restriction is not censorship, but it is intended to keep readers at HubPages and not direct traffic away from the site.  The only problem I have had so far happened when HubPages editors unpublished my article entitled "Juvenile Justice: Kids 4 Cash."  I published it in my MaryLovesJustice blog at this link: http://marylovesjustice.blogspot.com/2011/03/juvenile-justice-kids-4-cash.html  - The article discusses two cases before the U.S. Supreme Court in March 2011 for justices to decide if American children can be interrogated at their schools by police officers in the absence of parental knowledge, an attorney, a warrant, or a Miranda warning that anything the children say can and will be used against them in courts of law.  I did not and still do not find anything in my article that would justify it being unpublished, and I invite you to read it and give your opinion on the article.  Cyberstalkers also attacked the Juvenile Justice article when I published it in the MaryLovesJustice blog by making the font black in certain parts of the article, necessitating that people highlight those parts to read about a seventh-grader who was tried and sentenced as an adult under the circumstances listed above and a 14-year-old who was executed in South Carolina.  I feel that American parents and the entire village have a right and a responsibility to know about laws under consideration that affect our children, and all minors are our children.

Today, I commented on an article by an excellent writer I follow at HubPages.  His article called Hating and loving – a meditation on attachment and non-attachment is about forgiveness (that should be a link to the article by tonymac04).  My comment is being held for approval.  Since this comment like the Juvenile Justice article HubPages editors unpublished deals largely with the prison industrial complex, I decided to share it here in my JusticeGagged blog just in case.  See the comment below:

As a Christian, I agree that forgiveness is imperative to the offended as well as the offender.  Holding grudges is offensive to God and eliminates one's opportunity to be forgiven for sins, according to the Word. However, God outlined steps to address offenses by one's brother:  1.  Go to the brother in private and complain about the offense.  If he fails to do justice, then  2.  Take the offender before the Church.  If he fails to do justice, then  3.  Take the offender to court.

Righteous people, such as prophets, were judges over Israel.  Therefore, the Bible does not address what to do if judges are secretly aligned with oppressors.

The Bible says that we must forgive 70 times 7 . . . for the identical offense.  Whew!  That is unlimited forgiveness.  However, the process implies that persons asking for forgiveness are sorry about the transgression and repentant.  When we ask God for forgiveness, He is able to discern the sincerity of the person making the petition.  As humans, we do not have that ability.  What we must do is observe actions that follow apologies, such as the apologies by the United States Congress for slavery and Jim Crow.  Those apologies were given in midst of ongoing slavery via the prison industrial complex where 1 in 9 young black men under the age of 34 is incarcerated.  Many prisoners in America work up to seven days a week on jobs that were outsourced to prisons by state and federal governments and Fortune 500 companies that avoid unions, minimum wage and worker safety laws.

Rather than repenting for previous slavery, the prison industrial complex is intended to grow.  Laws are being considered that, if they pass, will criminalize many more minority people in America.  For instance, see my HubPages article entitled "NAACP vs. Black Cigarette Smokers."  The former association for the advancement of colored people petitioned Congress to outlaw menthol in cigarettes, which is the kind used by 80% of black smokers.  The law would apply almost exclusively to black people who use nicotine, one of the most addictive drugs in the world.  If it passes, the expensive War on Drugs would expand and hundreds of thousands more nonviolent offenders who are black would become "criminals" overnight and be subject to imprisonment like 2.3 million other Americans and immigrants.  Tough new immigration laws are also contested.  They propose imprisoning illegal immigrants in America rather than sending so many able-bodied potential prison laborers back to their own countries.  Considering the high incarceration rate, especially among blacks, and laws being considered to increase the number of black prison slaves, many people cannot believe in the sincerity of the Congressional apology for slavery.  Therefore, I do not believe it is wrong or evidence of holding a grudge to reject the apology for slavery and Jim Crow.  Google for an article I wrote during March 2011, the month when Troy Davis' appeal was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court, entitled "Empty Graves: Jim Crow and Jesus."

Thank you for another well-written article.  Forgiveness is good for the soul like laughter.  It will be wonderful when/if forgiveness is deserved one day by cessation of [systemic] discrimination and recompense for previous wrongs, which is also Godly.

That ended my comment at HubPages, which I think should post.  See also "Justice Gagged re Facebook, Justice Gagged re Twitgoo, Justice Gagged re Christianity, and Justice Gagged re Sick Vets.  I have to list my entries as I publish articles because otherwise, they may disappear on my blog's index and your browser may skip them.  Asking people to treat others like they want to be treated is censored now as it was 2,000 years ago when Jesus walked among us.  Please TRY to follow me at Twitter, where I am @koffietime

Blessings,

Mary Neal
http://WrongfulDeathofLarryNeal.com

http://hubpages.com/profile/Mary+Neal
http://FreeSpeakBlog.blogspot.com
http://MaryLovesJustice.blogspot.com
ASSISTANCE TO THE INCARCERATED MENTALLY ILL
http://www.care2.com/c2c/group/AIMI